↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for bacteriuria with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and its impact on mortality: a case–control study

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors for bacteriuria with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and its impact on mortality: a case–control study
Published in
Infection, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s15010-012-0380-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Shilo, M. V. Assous, T. Lachish, P. Kopuit, T. Bdolah-Abram, A. M. Yinnon, Y. Wiener-Well

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the mortality of and risk factors for bacteriuria due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) versus carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae (CSKp) producing extended spectrum β lactamase (ESBL).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 51%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,940,638
of 23,700,294 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#251
of 1,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,790
of 284,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,700,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.