↓ Skip to main content

Gender-specific profiles of tobacco use among non-institutionalized people with serious mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Gender-specific profiles of tobacco use among non-institutionalized people with serious mental illness
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-10-101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joy L Johnson, Pamela A Ratner, Leslie A Malchy, Chizimuzo TC Okoli, Ric M Procyshyn, Joan L Bottorff, Marlee Groening, Annette Schultz, Marg Osborne

Abstract

In many countries, smoking remains the leading preventable cause of death. In North America, reductions in population smoking levels are stabilising and, in recent years, those involved in tobacco control programming have turned their attention to particular segments of society that are at greatest risk for tobacco use. One such group is people with mental illness. A picture of tobacco use patterns among those with mental illness is beginning to emerge; however, there are several unanswered questions. In particular, most studies have been limited to particular in-patient groups. In addition, while it is recognised that men and women differ in relation to their reasons for smoking, levels of addiction to nicotine, and difficulties with cessation, these sex and gender differences have not been fully explored in psychiatric populations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 124 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 27%
Psychology 30 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,476
of 4,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,974
of 179,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.