↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D3—implications for brain development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin D3—implications for brain development
Published in
Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, May 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.070
Pubmed ID
Authors

John J. McGrath, François P. Féron, Thomas H.J. Burne, Alan Mackay-Sim, Darryl W. Eyles

Abstract

There is growing evidence that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1,25(OH)(2)D(3)) is active in the brain but until recently there was a lack of evidence about its role during brain development. Guided by certain features of the epidemiology of schizophrenia, our group has explored the role of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) in brain development using whole animal models and in vitro culture studies. The expression of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in the embryonic rat brain rises steadily between embryonic day 15-23, and 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) induces the expression of nerve growth factor and stimulates neurite outgrowth in embryonic hippocampal explant cultures. In the neonatal rat, low prenatal vitamin D(3) in utero leads to increased brain size, altered brain shape, enlarged ventricles, reduced expression of nerve growth factors, reduced expression of the low affinity p75 receptor and increased cellular proliferation. In summary, there is growing evidence that low prenatal levels of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) can influence critical components of orderly brain development. It remains to be seen if these processes are of clinical relevance in humans, but in light of the high rates of hypovitaminosis D in pregnant women and neonates, this area warrants further scrutiny.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 12 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
#265
of 2,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,672
of 62,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.