↓ Skip to main content

ζ-Carotene cis isomers as products and substrates in the plant poly-cis carotenoid biosynthetic pathway to lycopene

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
ζ-Carotene cis isomers as products and substrates in the plant poly-cis carotenoid biosynthetic pathway to lycopene
Published in
Planta, October 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00425-004-1395-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jürgen Breitenbach, Gerhard Sandmann

Abstract

The plant carotenoid biosynthetic pathway to cyclic carotenes proceeds via carotene precursors in cis configuration. Involvement of individual isomers was elucidated by genetic complementation of desaturations and in vitro reactions of the corresponding enzyme. Determination of substrate and product specificity of phytoene and zeta-carotene desaturase revealed that 15-cis-phytoene is converted to 9,15,9'-tricis-zeta-carotene with 15,9'-dicis-phytofluene as intermediate by the first desaturase. Prior to a subsequent conversion by zeta-carotene desaturase, the 15-cis double bond of 9,15,9'-tricis-zeta-carotene has to be (photo)isomerized to all-trans. Then, the resulting 9,9'-dicis-zeta-carotene is utilized by zeta-carotene desaturase via 7,9,9'-tricis-neurosporene to 7,9,7',9'-tetracis-lycopene. Other zeta-carotene isomers that are assumed to be spontaneous isomerization products were not converted, except for the asymmetric 9-cis-zeta-carotene. This isomer is desaturated only to 7,9-dicis-neurosporene resembling a dead-end of the pathway. Prolycopene, the product of the desaturation reactions, is finally isomerized by a specific isomerase to all-trans-lycopene, which is a prerequisite for cyclization to beta-carotene. The 5-cis-lycopene and the 9-cis-and 13-cis-beta-carotene isomers detected in leaves are thought to originate independently from cis precursors by non-enzymatic isomerization of their all-trans forms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Spain 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 78 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 57%
Chemistry 12 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#599
of 2,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,147
of 62,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.