↓ Skip to main content

A dioxygenase gene (Ids2) expressed under iron deficiency conditions in the roots of Hordeum vulgare

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, July 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
A dioxygenase gene (Ids2) expressed under iron deficiency conditions in the roots of Hordeum vulgare
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, July 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00029608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nami Okumura, Naoko-Kishi Nishizawa, Yosuke Umehara, Tomoko Ohata, Hiromi Nakanishi, Takahiro Yamaguchi, Mitsuo Chino, Satoshi Mori

Abstract

A lambda zapII cDNA library was constructed from mRNA isolated from Fe-deficient barley roots and screened with cDNA probes made from mRNA of Fe-deficient and Fe-sufficient (control) barley roots. Seven clones were selected. Among them a clone having the putative full-length mRNA of dioxygenase as judged by northern hybridization was selected and named Ids2 (iron deficiency-specific clone 2). Using a cDNA fragment as probe, two clones from the genomic library (lambda EMBL-III) were isolated and one was sequenced. The predicted amino acid sequence of Ids2 resembled that of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase. Ids2 is expressed in the Fe-deficient barley roots but is not in the leaves. The expression is repressed by the availability of Fe. Ids2 was also strongly expressed under Mn deficiency and weakly under Zn deficiency or excess NaCl (0.5%). The upstream 5'-flanking region of Ids2 has a root-specific cis element of the CaMV 35S promoter and a nodule-specific element of leghemoglobin, a metal regulatory element (MRE) and several Cu regulatory elements (UAS) of yeast metallothionein (CUP1).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Professor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 22%
Computer Science 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,697,128
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#390
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,584
of 21,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.