↓ Skip to main content

An emendation of Phallus glutinolens

Overview of attention for article published in Mycological Progress, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
An emendation of Phallus glutinolens
Published in
Mycological Progress, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11557-009-0603-7
Authors

Larissa Trierveiler-Pereira, Clarice Loguercio-Leite, Francisco D. Calonge, Iuri G. Baseia

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 14%
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 17 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 86%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#169
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,362
of 114,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them