↓ Skip to main content

Addendum to: Entropic Value-at-Risk: A New Coherent Risk Measure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 616)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Addendum to: Entropic Value-at-Risk: A New Coherent Risk Measure
Published in
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10957-012-0014-9
Authors

A. Ahmadi-Javid

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 7%
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 57%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 21%
Computer Science 2 14%
Mathematics 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,928,257
of 23,873,054 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
#40
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,599
of 160,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them