↓ Skip to main content

When two ‘wrongs’ make a right: An essay on business ethics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, February 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
When two ‘wrongs’ make a right: An essay on business ethics
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, February 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00382714
Authors

Gregory S. Kavka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 42%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,576,061
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,196
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,880
of 33,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them