↓ Skip to main content

A note on stable flow-equivalent aggregation in closed networks

Overview of attention for article published in Queueing Systems, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 100)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
A note on stable flow-equivalent aggregation in closed networks
Published in
Queueing Systems, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11134-008-9093-6
Authors

Giuliano Casale

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 20%
Computer Science 2 20%
Mathematics 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Queueing Systems
#11
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,288
of 91,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Queueing Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them