| Title |
A monograph of Cyrtostachys (Arecaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Kew Bulletin, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12225-009-9096-4 |
| Authors |
Charlie D. Heatubun, William J. Baker, Johanis P. Mogea, Madeline M. Harley, Sri S. Tjitrosoedirdjo, John Dransfield |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#257
of 1,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,964
of 93,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,091 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them