↓ Skip to main content

Structural mechanisms in muscle. Jean Hanson’s legacy: to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the sliding filament theory of muscle contraction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Structural mechanisms in muscle. Jean Hanson’s legacy: to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the sliding filament theory of muscle contraction
Published in
Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, August 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10974-004-3866-2
Authors

Edwin W. Taylor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility
#69
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,720
of 53,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.