↓ Skip to main content

The energy dispersive X-ray diffraction method: annotated bibliography 1968–78

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, February 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
The energy dispersive X-ray diffraction method: annotated bibliography 1968–78
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, February 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf02396775
Authors

E. Laine, I. Lähteenmäki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 25%
Materials Science 3 19%
Engineering 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Energy 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#934
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,629
of 27,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.