↓ Skip to main content

Review and update of paramphistomosis

Overview of attention for article published in Helminthologia, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 109)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Review and update of paramphistomosis
Published in
Helminthologia, June 2008
DOI 10.2478/s11687-008-0012-5
Authors

R. Sanabria, J. Romero

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 35%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Helminthologia
#12
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,948
of 97,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Helminthologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them