↓ Skip to main content

Individual patterns of tonal (whistling) signals of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates) kept in relative isolation

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Bulletin, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 250)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Individual patterns of tonal (whistling) signals of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates) kept in relative isolation
Published in
Biology Bulletin, September 2012
DOI 10.1134/s1062359012050020
Authors

A. V. Agafonov, E. M. Panova

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 64%
Environmental Science 7 21%
Psychology 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biology Bulletin
#38
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,173
of 186,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Bulletin
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them