↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Winding Numbers and Counting Complex Roots Through Cauchy Indices in Isabelle/HOL

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Automated Reasoning, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating Winding Numbers and Counting Complex Roots Through Cauchy Indices in Isabelle/HOL
Published in
Journal of Automated Reasoning, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10817-019-09521-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenda Li, Lawrence C. Paulson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#16,293,793
of 24,002,307 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Automated Reasoning
#87
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,386
of 355,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Automated Reasoning
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,002,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.