↓ Skip to main content

Randomized search trees

Overview of attention for article published in Algorithmica, October 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Randomized search trees
Published in
Algorithmica, October 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01940876
Authors

R. Seidel, C. R. Aragon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 9%
Germany 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
India 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 69 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 62 73%
Engineering 3 4%
Mathematics 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Algorithmica
#79
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,534
of 28,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithmica
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.