↓ Skip to main content

A basal phiomorph (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from the late Eocene of the Fayum Depression, Egypt

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
A basal phiomorph (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from the late Eocene of the Fayum Depression, Egypt
Published in
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13358-012-0039-6
Authors

Hesham M. Sallam, Erik R. Seiffert, Elwyn L. Simons

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 46%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#67
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,610
of 160,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.