↓ Skip to main content

Cliftonite: A proposed origin, and its bearing on the origin of diamonds in meteorites

Overview of attention for article published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, December 1969
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cliftonite: A proposed origin, and its bearing on the origin of diamonds in meteorites
Published in
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, December 1969
DOI 10.1016/0016-7037(69)90151-3
Authors

Robin Brett, G.T. Higgins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 14%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
#1,343
of 4,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,107
of 5,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them