| Title |
Institutional arrangement and typology of community forests of Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland of North-East India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Forestry Research, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11676-013-0337-x |
| Authors |
B. K. Tiwari, H. Tynsong, M. M. Lynrah, E. Lapasam, S. Deb, D. Sharma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,939,335
of 23,692,259 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forestry Research
#22
of 409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,442
of 286,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forestry Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,692,259 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them