↓ Skip to main content

Variation in timing and abundance of flowering by Delphinium barbeyi Huth (Ranunculaceae): the roles of snowpack, frost, and La Niña, in the context of climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Variation in timing and abundance of flowering by Delphinium barbeyi Huth (Ranunculaceae): the roles of snowpack, frost, and La Niña, in the context of climate change
Published in
Oecologia, February 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00442-001-0835-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David W. Inouye, Manuel A. Morales, Gary J. Dodge

Abstract

Delphinium barbeyi is a common herbaceous wildflower in montane meadows at 2,900 m near the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, and its flowers are important nectar resources for bumblebees and hummingbirds. During the period 1977-1999 flowering was highly variable in both timing (date of first flower ranged from 5 July to 6 August, mean=17 July) and abundance (maximum open flowers per 2×2-m plot ranged from 11.3 to 197.9, mean=82). Time and abundance of flowering are highly correlated with the previous winter's snowpack, as measured by the amount of snow remaining on the ground on 15 May (range 0-185 cm, mean=67.1). We used structural equation modeling to investigate relationships among snowpack, first date of bare ground, first date of flowering, number of inflorescences produced, and peak number of flowers, all of which are significantly correlated with each other. Snowpack depth on 15 May is a significant predictor of the first date of bare ground (R (2)=0.872), which in turn is a significant predictor of the first date of flowering (R (2)=0.858); snowpack depth is also significantly correlated with number of inflorescences produced (R (2)=0.713). Both the number of inflorescences and mean date of first flowering are significant predictors of flowers produced (but with no residual effect of snowpack). Part of the effect of snowpack on flowering may be mediated through an increased probability of frost damage in years with lower snowpack - the frequency of early-season "frost events" explained a significant proportion of the variance in the number of flowers per stem. There is significant reduction of flower production in La Niña episodes. The variation in number of flowers we have observed is likely to affect the pollination, mating system, and demography of the species. Through its effect on snowpack, frost events, and their interaction, climate change may influence all of these variables.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 5%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
France 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 171 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 21%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 56%
Environmental Science 42 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 23 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2013.
All research outputs
#4,697,128
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#967
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,358
of 123,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.