↓ Skip to main content

Arctiid moth clicks can degrade the accuracy of range difference discrimination in echolocating big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, May 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Arctiid moth clicks can degrade the accuracy of range difference discrimination in echolocating big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, May 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00215079
Pubmed ID
Authors

LeeA. Miller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 43%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 58%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Engineering 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,764,072
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#401
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,791
of 18,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.