↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of a Suicide Nomenclature within Two VA Healthcare Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of a Suicide Nomenclature within Two VA Healthcare Settings
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10880-011-9240-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa A. Brenner, Ryan E. Breshears, Lisa M. Betthauser, Katherine K. Bellon, Elizabeth Holman, Jeri E. F. Harwood, Morton M. Silverman, Joe Huggins, Herbert T. Nagamoto

Abstract

Suicide and suicide attempts are significant issues for military, Veterans Affairs (VA), and civilian healthcare systems. The lack of uniform terms related to self-directed violence (SDV) has inhibited epidemiological surveillance efforts, limited the generalizability of empirical studies of suicide and non-lethal forms of SDV, and complicated the implementation of evidence-based assessment and treatment strategies for individuals with suicidal thoughts and/or behaviors. The Department of Veterans Affairs recently adopted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) SDV Classification System (SDVCS). This paper describes an implementation study of the SDVCS in two VA Medical Centers. The Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 19 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) training program for the SDVCS, including the SDVCS Clinical Tool (CT), will be discussed. Although preliminary data suggest that the CT and SDVCS are generally perceived as being acceptable and useful, further work will likely be required to facilitate widespread adoption. Potential next steps in this process are presented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,697,128
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#101
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,225
of 111,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.