↓ Skip to main content

Thermal risk evaluation of organic peroxide by automatic pressure tracking adiabatic calorimeter

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Thermal risk evaluation of organic peroxide by automatic pressure tracking adiabatic calorimeter
Published in
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10973-006-7651-x
Authors

Y. Iwata, M. Momota, H. Koseki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 40%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#145
of 1,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,082
of 68,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.