↓ Skip to main content

Gene cloning and overproduction of low-specificity d-threonine aldolase from Alcaligenes xylosoxidans and its application for production of a key intermediate for parkinsonism drug

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Gene cloning and overproduction of low-specificity d-threonine aldolase from Alcaligenes xylosoxidans and its application for production of a key intermediate for parkinsonism drug
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2000
DOI 10.1007/s002539900301
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Q. Liu, M. Odani, T. Yasuoka, T. Dairi, N. Itoh, M. Kataoka, S. Shimizu, H. Yamada

Abstract

The dtaAX gene encoding a pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (pyridoxal-P)-dependent low-specificity D-threonine aldolase was cloned from the chromosomal DNA of Alcaligenes xylosoxidans IFO 12669. It contains an open reading frame consisting of 1,134 nucleotides corresponding to 377 amino acid residues. The predicted amino acid sequence displayed 54% identity with that of D-threonine aldolase from gram-positive bacteria Arthrobacter sp. DK-38, but showed no significant similarity with those of other known pyridoxal-P enzymes. This gram-negative bacterial enzyme was highly overproduced in recombinant Escherichia coli cells, and the specific activity of the enzyme in the cell extract was as high as 18 U/mg (purified enzyme 38.6 U/mg), which was 6,000 times higher than that from the wild-type Alcaligenes cell extract. The recombinant enzyme was thus feasibly purified to homogeneity by ammonium sulfate fractionation and DEAE-Toyopearl chromatography steps. The recombinant low-specificity D-threonine aldolase was shown to be an efficient biocatalyst for resolution of L-beta-3,4-methylenedioxyphenylserine, an intermediate for production of a therapeutic drug for Parkinson's disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 33%
Chemistry 7 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,898
of 8,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,226
of 39,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.