↓ Skip to main content

ZEBRA2, encoding a carotenoid isomerase, is involved in photoprotection in rice

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
ZEBRA2, encoding a carotenoid isomerase, is involved in photoprotection in rice
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11103-010-9719-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chenglin Chai, Jun Fang, Yang Liu, Hongning Tong, Yanqing Gong, Yiqin Wang, Min Liu, Youping Wang, Qian Qian, Zhukuan Cheng, Chengcai Chu

Abstract

"zebra" mutants have alternating green and chlorotic crossbands on leaf blades and are widely distributed in monocotyledonous crops. Most recently, we cloned the first responsible gene from rice, ZEBRA2, which also leads to the phenotype of rice preharvest sprouting. ZEBRA2, a single-copy gene in the rice genome, encodes a carotenoid isomerase (CRTISO), the key enzyme catalyzing the conversion of cis-lycopene to all-trans lycopene. ZEBRA2 shares high identity with known CRTISOs from other species. Expression analysis via both RT-PCR and ZEBRA2-promoter-β-glucuronidase (GUS) transgenic rice indicates that ZEBRA2 is predominantly expressed in mesophyll cells of mature leaves where active photosynthesis occurs. Consistent with the alteration in agronomic traits, the zebra2 mutant exhibits decreased photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content. Mutation of the ZEBRA2 gene results in the accumulation of all-trans-lycopene precursor, prolycopene (7Z,9Z,7'Z,9'Z tetra cis-lycopene), in dark-grown zebra2 tissues. Light-grown zebra2 mutant exhibits the characteristic "zebra" phenotype and decreased level of lutein, the xanthophyll that is essential for efficient chl triplet quenching. More severe phenotype of the zebra2 mutant under high light intensity indicates that "zebra" phenotype might be caused by photooxidative damages. We conclude that ZEBRA2 is involved in photoprotection in rice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Other 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 13 26%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Mathematics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#976
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,153
of 180,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.