| Title |
Hopanoid Biosynthesis and Function in Bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Science of Nature, April 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001140050592 |
| Authors |
Elmar L. Kannenberg, Karl Poralla |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 24% |
| Researcher | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 27 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 25 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,084,906
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#271
of 2,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,169
of 37,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them