↓ Skip to main content

Deposition of inhaled particles in the human lung is more peripheral in lunar than in normal gravity

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Deposition of inhaled particles in the human lung is more peripheral in lunar than in normal gravity
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00421-008-0766-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chantal Darquenne, G. Kim Prisk

Abstract

Lunar dust presents a potential toxic challenge to future explorers of the moon. The extent of the inflammatory response to lunar dust will in part depend on where in the lung particles deposit. To determine the effect of lowered gravity, we measured deposition of 0.5 and 1 microm diameter particles in six subjects on the ground (1G) and during short periods of lunar gravity (1/6G) aboard the NASA Microgravity Research Aircraft. Total deposition was measured during continuous aerosol breathing, and regional deposition by aerosol bolus inhalations at penetration volumes (V (p)) of 200, 500 and 1,200 ml. For both particle sizes (d (p)), deposition was gravity-dependent with the lowest deposition occurring at the lower G-level. Total deposition decreased by 25 and 32% from 1G to 1/6G for 0.5 and 1 microm diameter particles, respectively. In the bolus tests, deposition increased with increasing V (p). However, the penetration volume required to achieve a given deposition level was larger in 1/6G than in 1G. For example, for d (p) = 1 microm (0.5 microm), a level of 25% deposition was reached at V (p) = 260 ml (370 ml) in 1G but not until V (p) = 730 ml (835 ml) in 1/6G. Thus in 1G, deposition in more central airways reduces the transport of fine particles to the lung periphery. In the fractional gravity environment of a lunar outpost, while inhaled fine particle deposition may be lower than on earth, those particles that are deposited will do so in more peripheral regions of the lung.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Librarian 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Engineering 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,104
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,994
of 97,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.