↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of oxygen heterocyclic compounds in citrus essential oils by capillary electrochromatography and comparison with HPLC

Overview of attention for article published in Chromatographia, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of oxygen heterocyclic compounds in citrus essential oils by capillary electrochromatography and comparison with HPLC
Published in
Chromatographia, January 2001
DOI 10.1007/bf02492428
Authors

A. Cavazza, K. D. Bartle, P. Dugo, L. Mondello

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 30%
Chemical Engineering 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Chromatographia
#137
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,434
of 114,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromatographia
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.