↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of development and succession of vegetated hummocks in slacks of the Alexandria coastal dune field, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Coastal Conservation, December 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of development and succession of vegetated hummocks in slacks of the Alexandria coastal dune field, South Africa
Published in
Journal of Coastal Conservation, December 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02730471
Authors

Bridget L. Elliott, Graham I. H. Kerley, Anton McLachlan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Professor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 4 27%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 33%
Environmental Science 3 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 20%
Decision Sciences 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Coastal Conservation
#80
of 470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,388
of 117,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Coastal Conservation
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 470 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them