↓ Skip to main content

5-SPICE: the application of an original framework for community health worker program design, quality improvement and research agenda setting

Overview of attention for article published in Global Health Action, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
5-SPICE: the application of an original framework for community health worker program design, quality improvement and research agenda setting
Published in
Global Health Action, April 2013
DOI 10.3402/gha.v6i0.19658
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Palazuelos, Kyla Ellis, Dana DaEun Im, Matthew Peckarsky, Dan Schwarz, Didi Bertrand Farmer, Ranu Dhillon, Ari Johnson, Claudia Orihuela, Jill Hackett, Junior Bazile, Leslie Berman, Madeleine Ballard, Raj Panjabi, Ralph Ternier, Sam Slavin, Scott Lee, Steve Selinsky, Carole Diane Mitnick

Abstract

Despite decades of experience with community health workers (CHWs) in a wide variety of global health projects, there is no established conceptual framework that structures how implementers and researchers can understand, study and improve their respective programs based on lessons learned by other CHW programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 130 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 34 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,405,755
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Global Health Action
#528
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,441
of 212,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health Action
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.