↓ Skip to main content

The Exiguobacterium genus: biodiversity and biogeography

Overview of attention for article published in Extremophiles, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
The Exiguobacterium genus: biodiversity and biogeography
Published in
Extremophiles, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00792-009-0243-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatiana A. Vishnivetskaya, Sophia Kathariou, James M. Tiedje

Abstract

Bacteria of the genus Exiguobacterium are low G + C, Gram-positive facultative anaerobes that have been repeatedly isolated from ancient Siberian permafrost. In addition, Exiguobacterium spp. have been isolated from markedly diverse sources, including Greenland glacial ice, hot springs at Yellowstone National Park, the rhizosphere of plants, and the environment of food processing plants. Strains of this hereto little known bacterium that have been retrieved from such different (and often extreme) environments are worthy of attention as they are likely to be specifically adapted to such environments and to carry variations in the genome which may correspond to psychrophilic and thermophilic adaptations. However, comparative genomic investigations of Exiguobacterium spp. from different sources have been limited. In this study, we employed different molecular approaches for the comparative analysis of 24 isolates from markedly diverse environments including ancient Siberian permafrost and hot springs at Yellowstone National Park. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with I-CeuI (an intron-encoded endonuclease), AscI and NotI were optimized for the determination of genomic fingerprints of nuclease-producing isolates. The application of a DNA macroarray for 82 putative stress-response genes yielded strain-specific hybridization profiles. Cluster analyses of 16S rRNA gene sequence data, PFGE I-CeuI restriction patterns and hybridization profiles suggested that Exiguobacterium strains formed two distinct divisions that generally agreed with temperature ranges for growth. With few exceptions (e.g., Greenland ice isolate GIC31), psychrotrophic and thermophilic isolates belonged to different divisions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 210 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 20%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 53 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 16%
Environmental Science 16 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 62 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#228
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,637
of 93,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them