Title |
Improvement of spinosad producing Saccharopolyspora spinosa by rational screening
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, August 2006
|
DOI | 10.1631/jzus.2006.as0366 |
Authors |
Zhi-hua Jin, Jian-ping Wu, Yuan Zhang, Xiu Cheng, Li-rong Yang, Pei-lin Cen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 28% |
Researcher | 6 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 60% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A
#5
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,242
of 90,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them