| Title |
Thermotoga neapolitana sp. nov. of the extremely thermophilic, eubacterial genus Thermotoga
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Microbiology, May 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00409725 |
| Authors |
Holger W. Jannasch, Robert Huber, Shimshon Belkin, Karl O. Stetter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,697,128
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#219
of 2,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,586
of 13,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.