Title |
Irreversible Electroporation in a Swine Lung Model
|
---|---|
Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00270-010-0091-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Damian E. Dupuy, Bassam Aswad, Thomas Ng |
Abstract |
This study was designed to evaluate the safety and tissue effects of IRE in a swine lung model. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
Professor | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 26% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 35% |
Engineering | 7 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,689,563
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#285
of 2,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,336
of 180,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.