↓ Skip to main content

First fossil horsefly (Diptera: Tabanidae) in Miocene Mexican amber

Overview of attention for article published in PalZ, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
First fossil horsefly (Diptera: Tabanidae) in Miocene Mexican amber
Published in
PalZ, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12542-013-0171-7
Authors

Jonina Strelow, Mónica M. Solórzano Kraemer, Sergio Ibáñez-Bernal, Jes Rust

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Germany 1 7%
Brazil 1 7%
Unknown 12 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 67%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from PalZ
#213
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,323
of 196,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PalZ
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.