↓ Skip to main content

A proteomic determination of cold adaptation in the Antarctic archaeon, Methanococcoides burtonii

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Microbiology, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A proteomic determination of cold adaptation in the Antarctic archaeon, Methanococcoides burtonii
Published in
Molecular Microbiology, May 2004
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04130.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber Goodchild, Neil F. W. Saunders, Haluk Ertan, Mark Raftery, Michael Guilhaus, Paul M. G. Curmi, Ricardo Cavicchioli

Abstract

A global view of the biology of the cold-adapted archaeon Methanococcoides burtonii was achieved using proteomics. Proteins specific to growth at 4 degrees C versus T(opt) (23 degrees C) were identified by mass spectrometry using the draft genome sequence of M. burtonii. mRNA levels were determined for all genes identified by proteomics, and specific enzyme assays confirmed the protein expression results. Key aspects of cold adaptation related to transcription, protein folding and metabolism, including specific roles for RNA polymerase subunit E, a response regulator and peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerase. Heat shock protein DnaK was expressed during growth at T(opt), indicating that growth at 'optimal' temperatures was stressful for this cold-adapted organism. Expression of trimethylamine methyltransferase involves contiguous translation of two open reading frames, which is likely to result from incorporation of pyrrolysine at an amber stop codon. Thermal regulation in M. burtonii is achieved through complex gene expression events involving gene clusters and operons, through to protein modifications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Professor 8 9%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Environmental Science 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,211,571
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Microbiology
#2,908
of 6,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,953
of 61,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Microbiology
#29
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,870 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.