↓ Skip to main content

Cloning of the thermostable α-amylase gene from Pyrococcus woesei in Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biotechnology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Cloning of the thermostable α-amylase gene from Pyrococcus woesei in Escherichia coli
Published in
Molecular Biotechnology, January 2004
DOI 10.1385/mb:26:2:101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beata Grzybowska, Piotr Szweda, Józef Synowiecki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Unspecified 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Unspecified 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biotechnology
#312
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,568
of 143,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biotechnology
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.