↓ Skip to main content

Diverse Mesorhizobium plurifarium populations native to Mexican soils

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Diverse Mesorhizobium plurifarium populations native to Mexican soils
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, October 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00203-003-0610-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

En Tao Wang, Feng Ling Kan, Zhi Yuan Tan, Ivonne Toledo, Wen Xin Chen, Esperanza Martínez-Romero

Abstract

Forty-six Mesorhizobium strains associated with the leguminous plants Leucaena leucocephala and Sesbania herbacea in an uncultivated Mexican field were characterized using a polyphasic approach. The strains were identified as Mesorhizobium plurifarium based upon the close relationships with the reference strains for this species in PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses, sequencing of 16S rRNA genes, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, and DNA-DNA hybridization. Although the strains isolated from both plants formed the same group in multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and cross-nodulations were observed in the laboratory, different electrophoretic types were obtained from the two plants grown in natural soils, indicating the existence of a preferable association between the plants and the rhizobia. The M. plurifarium strains from Mexico and the reference strains from Africa and Brazil formed different phenotypic clusters in a numerical taxonomy. The Mexican strains did not grow at 37 degrees C and were sensitive to salty-alkaline conditions, while the reference strains from Africa and Brazil grew at 42 degrees C and were more resistant to salty-alkaline conditions. These results demonstrate that both the plants and environmental factors affected the evolution of rhizobia and that the Mexican strains had adapted to the neutral soils and the cool climate where they were isolated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 55%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#642
of 3,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,875
of 56,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.