↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Nonsteroidal Androgen Receptor Ligands

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
26 patents
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Nonsteroidal Androgen Receptor Ligands
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11095-006-9024-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenqing Gao, Juhyun Kim, James T. Dalton

Abstract

Testosterone and structurally related anabolic steroids have been used to treat hypogonadism, muscle wasting, osteoporosis, male contraception, cancer cachexia, anemia, and hormone replacement therapy in aging men or age-related frailty; while antiandrogens may be useful for treatment of conditions like acne, alopecia (male-pattern baldness), hirsutism, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer. However, the undesirable physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of steroidal androgen receptor (AR) ligands limited their clinical use. Nonsteroidal AR ligands with improved pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties have been developed to overcome these problems. This review focuses on the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and pharmacology of clinically used and emerging nonsteroidal AR ligands, including antagonists, agonists, and selective androgen receptor modulators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 25%
Chemistry 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 25 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,422,100
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#198
of 3,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,264
of 92,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.