| Title |
Chlorothalonil degradation by Ochrobactrum lupini strain TP-D1 and identification of its metabolites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11274-010-0631-0 |
| Authors |
Xiu-Zhen Shi, Rong-Jun Guo, Kazuhiro Takagi, Zuo-Qing Miao, Shi-Dong Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#384
of 1,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,027
of 198,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,943 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.