↓ Skip to main content

Hyalohyphomycosis caused byPaecilomyces variotii: a case report, animal pathogenicity and ‘in vitro’ sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, October 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Hyalohyphomycosis caused byPaecilomyces variotii: a case report, animal pathogenicity and ‘in vitro’ sensitivity
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, October 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00582583
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaishree Naidu, S. M. Singh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 50%
Computer Science 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#534
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,342
of 19,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them