↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian models of eye movement selection with retinotopic maps

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Bayesian models of eye movement selection with retinotopic maps
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00422-009-0292-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francis Colas, Fabien Flacher, Thomas Tanner, Pierre Bessière, Benoît Girard

Abstract

Among the various possible criteria guiding eye movement selection, we investigate the role of position uncertainty in the peripheral visual field. In particular, we suggest that, in everyday life situations of object tracking, eye movement selection probably includes a principle of reduction of uncertainty. To evaluate this hypothesis, we confront the movement predictions of computational models with human results from a psychophysical task. This task is a freely moving eye version of the multiple object tracking task, where the eye movements may be used to compensate for low peripheral resolution. We design several Bayesian models of eye movement selection with increasing complexity, whose layered structures are inspired by the neurobiology of the brain areas implied in this process. Finally, we compare the relative performances of these models with regard to the prediction of the recorded human movements, and show the advantage of taking explicitly into account uncertainty for the prediction of eye movements.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 7%
Germany 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 47 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 32%
Computer Science 9 16%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#185
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,018
of 172,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them