↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian processing of vestibular information

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Bayesian processing of vestibular information
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00422-006-0133-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Laurens, Jacques Droulez

Abstract

Complex self-motion stimulations in the dark can be powerfully disorienting and can create illusory motion percepts. In the absence of visual cues, the brain has to use angular and linear acceleration information provided by the vestibular canals and the otoliths, respectively. However, these sensors are inaccurate and ambiguous. We propose that the brain processes these signals in a statistically optimal fashion, reproducing the rules of Bayesian inference. We also suggest that this processing is related to the statistics of natural head movements. This would create a perceptual bias in favour of low velocity and acceleration. We have constructed a Bayesian model of self-motion perception based on these assumptions. Using this model, we have simulated perceptual responses to centrifugation and off-vertical axis rotation and obtained close agreement with experimental findings. This demonstrates how Bayesian inference allows to make a quantitative link between sensor noise and ambiguities, statistics of head movement, and the perception of self-motion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
France 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 125 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Master 25 18%
Professor 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 18%
Psychology 25 18%
Neuroscience 24 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Computer Science 10 7%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#185
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,476
of 155,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.