↓ Skip to main content

Genetic analyses in a variant of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MURCS association)

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Medica Austriaca, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Genetic analyses in a variant of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MURCS association)
Published in
Acta Medica Austriaca, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00508-008-0995-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerda Hofstetter, Nicole Concin, Christian Marth, Tuula Rinne, Martin Erdel, Andreas Janecke

Abstract

Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is characterized by the congenital absence of uterus and upper part of the vagina as a result of Mullerian duct agenesis. The combination of MRKH syndrome with renal anomalies and cervicothoracic dysplasia is known as MURCS association (Mullerian aplasia, Renal anomalies, and Cervicothoracic Somite dysplasia). The etiology remains poorly understood. We delineate this disease by reporting on a 16-year-old patient showing the cardinal features of MURCS association accompanied by a persistent left superior vena cava and atrial septal defect, orofacial clefting, and mild reduction deformities of the left hand. Fluorescence in situ hybridization did not show major deletions or duplications of the DiGeorge/VCFS (velocardiofacial syndrome) region at chromosome 22q11.1 as well as the TBX5/TBX3 region at 12q24.1. In addition, sequencing of the TP63L (p63) gene, residing at 3q27, remained normal in the presented patient. Thus, we provide further evidence for the genetic heterogeneity of MURCS association.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Psychology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,556,131
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#285
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,587
of 95,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.