| Title |
CIRSE Guidelines on Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-017-1574-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georgia Tsoumakidou, Chow Wei Too, Guillaume Koch, Jean Caudrelier, Roberto Luigi Cazzato, Julien Garnon, Afshin Gangi |
| Abstract |
Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is an important cause of severe debilitating back pain, adversely affecting quality of life, physical function, psychosocial performance, mental health and survival. Different vertebral augmentation procedures (VAPs) are used in order to consolidate the VCFs, relief pain,and whenever posible achieve vertebral body height restoration. In the present review we give the indications, contraindications, safety profile and outcomes of the existing percutaneous VAPs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| Austria | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 24% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 51% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,389,117
of 24,333,504 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#578
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,985
of 425,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#30
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,333,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.