↓ Skip to main content

The Failure in NGF Maturation and its Increased Degradation as the Probable Cause for the Vulnerability of Cholinergic Neurons in Alzheimer’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Neurochemical Research, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The Failure in NGF Maturation and its Increased Degradation as the Probable Cause for the Vulnerability of Cholinergic Neurons in Alzheimer’s Disease
Published in
Neurochemical Research, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11064-006-9270-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Claudio Cuello, Martin A. Bruno

Abstract

This short review discusses the arguments to consider the dismetabolism of the pathway responsible for both the maturation and degradation of NGF as the culprit of vulnerability of the forebrain cholinergic system to the Alzheimer's disease neuropathology. This summary includes information regarding a novel metabolic cascade converting Pro-NGF to mature NGF in the extracellular space and its ultimate degradation by a metalloprotease. It also describes how this pathway is altered in Alzheimer's disease with the consequential CNS accumulation of proNGF and impairment in the formation of NGF along with increased degradation of this key trophic factor. This metabolic scenario in Alzheimer's disease should result in the failure of NGF trophic support to forebrain cholinergic neurons and thus explaining the vulnerability of these neurons in this neurodegenerative condition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 44%
Neuroscience 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#589
of 2,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,038
of 76,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,097 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.