| Title |
Phylogeny and biogeography ofOrobanchaceae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Geobotanica, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02803229 |
| Authors |
Andrea D. Wolfe, Christopher P. Randle, Liang Liu, Kim E. Steiner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 78% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#36
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,307
of 57,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.