↓ Skip to main content

Learning syntax by automata induction

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Learning, March 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Learning syntax by automata induction
Published in
Machine Learning, March 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00058753
Authors

Robert C. Berwick, Sam Pilato

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Italy 1 4%
India 1 4%
Netherlands 1 4%
Slovakia 1 4%
Czechia 1 4%
China 1 4%
Croatia 1 4%
Unknown 15 63%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 33%
Researcher 5 21%
Other 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 20 83%
Engineering 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Machine Learning
#344
of 1,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,223
of 11,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Learning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them