↓ Skip to main content

Growth of Acinetobacter gerneri P7 on polyurethane and the purification and characterization of a polyurethanase enzyme

Overview of attention for article published in Biodegradation, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 368)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Growth of Acinetobacter gerneri P7 on polyurethane and the purification and characterization of a polyurethanase enzyme
Published in
Biodegradation, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10532-011-9533-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary T. Howard, William N. Norton, Timothy Burks

Abstract

A soil microorganism, designated as P7, was characterized and investigated for its ability to degrade polyurethane (PU). This bacterial isolate was identified as Acinetobacter gerneri on the basis of 16 s rRNA sequencing and biochemical phenotype analysis. The ability of this organism to degrade polyurethane was characterized by the measurement of growth, SEM observation, measurement of electrophoretic mobility and the purification and characterization of a polyurethane degrading enzyme. The purified protein has a molecular weight of approximately 66 kDa as determined by SDS-PAGE. Substrate specificity was examined using p-nitrophenyl substrates with varying carbon lengths. The highest substrate specificity was observed using p-nitrophenyl-propanate with an activity of 37.58 ± 0.21 U mg(-1). Additionally, the enzyme is inhibited by phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride and by ethylenediamine-tetra acetic acid. When grown on Impranil DLN(™) YES medium, a lag phase was noted for the first 3 h which was followed by logarithmic growth for 5 h. For the linear portion of growth between 5 and 9 h, a μ value of 0.413 doublings h(-1) was calculated. After 9 h of incubation the cell number dramatically decreased resulting in a chalky precipitate. Measurements of electrophoretic mobility indicated the formation of a complex between the PU and A. gerneri P7 cells. A hybrid zeta potential had been generated between the cells and polyurethane. Further evidence for a complex was provided by SEM observation where cells appeared to cluster along the surface of polyurethane particles and along edges of polyurethane films. Occasionally, the cells established an anchor-like structure that connected the cells to polyurethane particles.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 29 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Chemical Engineering 7 7%
Chemistry 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 39 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,272,848
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Biodegradation
#7
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,098
of 242,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodegradation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them