↓ Skip to main content

Reply to letter by Jargin on “overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: poorly substantiated information published”

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Reply to letter by Jargin on “overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: poorly substantiated information published”
Published in
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00411-010-0314-0
Authors

Alexey Yablokov, Alexey Nesterenko

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#131
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,455
of 83,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.